Car comparison

Alpine A110 GTS 1.8vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 P300

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpine A110

GTS 1.8

300 hp1798 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2025-present
VS

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017

P300

300 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpine A110 GTS 1.8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    275 km/h
    171 mph Unrestricted
    260 km/h
    162 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Lightest
    1,145 kg
    2,524 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    262 hp/t
    195 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    71/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    38/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpineA110GTS 1.8JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
Power
300hp224kW
300hp224kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,145kg2,524lb
1,450kg3,197lb
Gross weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,925kg4,244lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
52.2s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph
Calculated
75.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
5.7s
0-200 km/h
13.2s
Calculated
19.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
5.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb
Calculated
207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton
Calculated
276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
634km394mi
Calculated
797km496mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,181mm165in
4,482mm176in
Width
1,798mm71in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,248mm49in
1,311mm52in
Wheelbase
2,420mm95in
2,622mm103in
Front track-
1,597mm63in
Rear track-
1,649mm65in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
100mm4in
Trunk volume-
310L
Max trunk volume-
408L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
45L
63L
CO2 emissions-
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpine A110 GTS 1.8Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 P300PowerTorque
  • Alpine A110 GTS 1.8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 P300: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpineA110GTS 1.86,300 rpm2,400-6,000 rpm6,550 rpm
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P3005,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpineA110GTS 1.8JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
5.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
5.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.2 s
19.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.3 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
192 km/h
120 mph
170 km/h
106 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
300 hp
224 kW
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
300 hp
224 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
1,145 kg
2,524 lb
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
1,450 kg
3,197 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.84.2 s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P3005.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 GTS 1.8 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 P300: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A110 GTS 1.8 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 P300: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
207 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
634 km
394 mi
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
797 km
496 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
300 hp
224 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
300 hp
224 kW
5.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,181 mm
164.6 in
Height
1,248 mm
49.1 in
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,482 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Alpine A110 GTS 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
4.2 s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
5.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
207 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpineA110GTS 1.8JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,145 kg
2,524 lb
1,450 kg
3,197 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,181 mm
164.6 in
Height
1,248 mm
49.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,482 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
Range score
634 km
394 mi
797 km
496 mi
CO2 score
-
179 g/km
Trunk score
-
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
207 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpine A110 GTS 1.8Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 P300
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpine A110 GTS 1.8

  • Is 305 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 55 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 P300

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Has 164 km (102 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpine A110 GTS 1.8
Jaguar F-type Coupe P300
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GTS 1.8
M235
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)M235
P300
2.0
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
GTS 1.8
M235i
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F44)M235i
P300
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300vsJaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6
GTS 1.8
2.0 TFSI
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsAUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
P300
P300
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017P300
GTS 1.8
500h V6
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsLexusLC500h V6
P300
2.0
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0
GTS 1.8
3.0 V6
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6
P300
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017P300vsJaguarF-type Convertible3.0 V6
GTS 1.8
M240i
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsBMW2 Series Coupe (G42)M240i
GTS 1.8
2.0
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsPorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
Alpine A110 GTS 1.8 vs Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 P300 - car comparison - FastVsFaster