Alpine A110
Car comparison
Alpine A110 1.8vsBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) · Facelift 2017 430i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) · Facelift 2017
430i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpine A110 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Lightest1,140 kg2,513 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score66/100
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 430i
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,034 km643 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpineA1101.8 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,140kg2,513lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 2,030kg4,475lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.3s Calculated | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 643km399mi Calculated | 1,034km643mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,181mm165in | 4,640mm183in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,252mm49in | 1,377mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,420mm95in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,593mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpine A110 1.8: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 430i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 5,200 rpm | 1,450-4,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpineA1101.8 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.3 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 252 hp 188 kW |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 252 hp 188 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 1,140 kg 2,513 lb |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 4.5 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 1.8 and BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 430i: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 430i and Alpine A110 1.8: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 643 km 399 mi |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 1,034 km 643 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 252 hp 188 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 252 hp 188 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpine A110 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpineA1101.8 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,140 kg 2,513 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 643 km 399 mi | 1,034 km 643 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpine A110 1.8 | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 430i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpine A110 1.8
- Is 370 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 430i
- Has 30 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 392 km (243 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























