Alpina XB7
Car comparison
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8vsTesla Model X Performance 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model X
Performance 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful621 hp463 kW
- Largest trunk750 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Lightest2,562 kg5,648 lb
- Best power-to-weight238 hp/t178 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 621hp463kW | 611hp456kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 2,655kg5,853lb | 2,562kg5,648lb |
| Gross weight | 3,290kg7,253lb | 3,120kg6,878lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.9s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 31.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.5s Calculated | 9.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 238hp/t178kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 692km430mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | - |
| Length | 5,151mm203in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,999mm79in |
| Height | 1,797mm71in | 1,684mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,105mm122in | 2,965mm117in |
| Front track | 1,682mm66in | 1,705mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,703mm67in | 1,710mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 223mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 750L | 357L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,120L | 2,166L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.5 s | 9.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 10.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 621 hp 463 kW |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW |
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 has 10 hp more than Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh and Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 2,562 kg 5,648 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 4.2 s |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 2.9 s |
Although Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 has more power, Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh and Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 621 hp 463 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW | 2.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 621 hp 463 kW | 611 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb | 2,562 kg 5,648 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 692 km 430 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 750 L 26.5 cu ft | 357 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 393 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh
- Is 93 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























