Car comparison

Alpina XB7 4.4 V8vsBMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpina XB7

4.4 V8

621 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turbo2020-2022
VS

BMW X5 M (F95)

4.4 V8

600 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbocharged2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpina XB7 4.4 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    300 km/h
    186 mph Unrestricted
    290 km/h
    180 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    621 hp
    463 kW
  • Highest torque
    800 Nm
    590 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.0 L/100 km
    19.6 mpg US
    23.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.0 L/100 km
    14.7 mpg US
    17.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    692 km
    430 mi
  • Largest trunk
    750 L
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    85/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Lightest
    2,295 kg
    5,060 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    261 hp/t
    195 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaXB74.4 V8BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
Power
621hp463kW
600hp447kW
Torque
800Nm590lb-ft
750Nm553lb-ft
Curb weight
2,655kg5,853lb
2,295kg5,060lb
Gross weight
3,290kg7,253lb
3,000kg6,614lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
85.9s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
48.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
14.5s
Calculated
13.5s
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK
17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
12.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb
Calculated
261hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton
Calculated
327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
692km430mi
Calculated
654km406mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
5,151mm203in
4,938mm194in
Width
2,000mm79in
2,015mm79in
Height
1,797mm71in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
3,105mm122in
2,972mm117in
Front track
1,682mm66in
1,699mm67in
Rear track
1,703mm67in
1,688mm66in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
750L
580L
Max trunk volume
2,120L
1,530L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
83L
83L
CO2 emissions-
289g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina XB7 4.4 V8BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
  • BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaXB74.4 V85,500-6,500 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V86,000 rpm1,800-5,600 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaXB74.4 V8BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.5 s
13.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.3 s
10.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
12.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
186 km/h
115 mph
190 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
621 hp
463 kW
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
600 hp
447 kW

Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 has 21 hp more than BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8 and Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: 21 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
2,655 kg
5,853 lb
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
2,295 kg
5,060 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXB74.4 V84.2 s
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V83.9 s

Although Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 has more power, BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8 and Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 and BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
234 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
261 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
692 km
430 mi
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
654 km
406 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
621 hp
463 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
600 hp
447 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
Power
621 hp
463 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
750 L
26.5 cu ft
Length
5,151 mm
202.8 in
Height
1,797 mm
70.7 in
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
580 L
20.5 cu ft
Length
4,938 mm
194.4 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
Power
621 hp
463 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK

Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
4.2 s
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpinaXB74.4 V8
234 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
261 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaXB74.4 V8BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
Power
621 hp
463 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,655 kg
5,853 lb
2,295 kg
5,060 lb
Fuel consumption
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
750 L
26.5 cu ft
Length
5,151 mm
202.8 in
Height
1,797 mm
70.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
580 L
20.5 cu ft
Length
4,938 mm
194.4 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
692 km
430 mi
654 km
406 mi
CO2 score
-
289 g/km
Trunk score
750 L
26.5 cu ft
580 L
20.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
234 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
261 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina XB7 4.4 V8BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8
Consumption12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.00 LC100 km22.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.80 LC100 mi35.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,150 LC/year3,334 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina XB7 4.4 V8

  • Has 21 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 170 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8

  • Is 360 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8
BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 V8
AMG GLE 63 S V8
VS
AlpinaXB74.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)AMG GLE 63 S V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
4.4 V8
AMG GLS 63 V8
VS
AlpinaXB74.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8
4.4 V8
4.4
VS
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (E70)4.4
4.4 V8
Speed 6.0 W12 TSI
VS
AlpinaXB74.4 V8vsBentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
4.4 V8
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
AlpinaXB74.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (F95)Competition 4.4 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8vsBMWM8 Convertible (F91)4.4 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8vsBMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8
4.4 V8
SPEED 6.0 TSI W12
VS
AlpinaXB74.4 V8vsBentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8vsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8
4.4 V8
6.0 W12
VS
AlpinaXB74.4 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 vs BMW X5 M (F95) 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster