Alpina Roadster V8
Car comparison
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32VvsMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995
AMG SL 60 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight236 hp/t176 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range785 km488 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381hp284kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.3s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 19.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 322Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated | 313Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 785km488mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,837cc295cu in | 5,956cc363cu in |
| Length | 4,400mm173in | 4,499mm177in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,812mm71in |
| Height | 1,320mm52in | 1,296mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | 2,515mm99in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,532mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 265L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 5,800 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 110 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 381 hp 284 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 381 hp 284 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 5.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 785 km 488 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp 284 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 785 km 488 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 265 L 9.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V | Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 89 km (55 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8
- Has 60 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























