Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5)
Car comparison
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16VvsAlpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina Roadster V8
4.8 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score82/100
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed281 km/h175 mph
- Lightest1,475 kg3,252 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best practicality score36/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 355hp265kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 253Nm187lb-ft | 520Nm384lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.5s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph Calculated | 73.3s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.8s Calculated | 17.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated | 322Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 785km488mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 4,837cc295cu in |
| Length | 4,566mm180in | 4,400mm173in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,211mm48in | 1,320mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,656mm105in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 393L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V: Power / Torque
- Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 5,600 rpm | 5,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 5,800 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.8 s | 17.1 s |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 116 mph | 178 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 355 hp 265 kW |
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 381 hp 284 kW |
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V has 26 hp more than Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V and Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 253 Nm 187 lb-ft |
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 4.7 s |
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 5.3 s |
Although Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V has more power, Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V and Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 355 hp 265 kW | 4.7 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 355 hp 265 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 253 Nm 187 lb-ft | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 785 km 488 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 393 L 13.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 267 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























