Alpina D3 Touring (E91)
Car comparison
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsVolvo V70 III 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V70 III
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 214hp160kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,567kg3,455lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 79.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 864km537mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,541mm179in | 4,823mm190in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,907mm75in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,547mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,816mm111in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 151mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,385L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel: Power / Torque
- Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 4,100 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,980 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 214 hp 160 kW |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has 26 hp more than Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 7.2 s |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 7.7 s |
Although Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has more power, Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 864 km 537 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 214 hp 160 kW | 7.2 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 214 hp 160 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 864 km 537 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 7 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 136 km (84 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























