Alpina D3 Touring (E91)
Car comparison
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful214 hp160 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,515 kg3,340 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 214hp160kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,515kg3,340lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 72.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 29.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,541mm179in | 4,666mm184in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 442L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,385L | 1,354L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 4,100 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 29.9 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 214 hp 160 kW |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel has 14 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 7.2 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 909 km 565 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 214 hp 160 kW | 7.2 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 214 hp 160 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 909 km 565 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 91 km (56 mi) more estimated range
- Has 18 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Is 45 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























