Car comparison

Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

Volvo S60 II

2.4 D5

215 hp2400 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    244 km/h
    152 mph
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,480 kg
    3,263 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
214hp160kW
215hp160kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,480kg3,263lb
1,608kg3,545lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
64.5s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
23.3s
Calculated
26.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,130km702mi
Calculated
1,144km711mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
2,400cc146cu in
Length
4,545mm179in
4,628mm182in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,413mm56in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,760mm109in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,513mm60in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
450L
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
68L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5PowerTorque
  • Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel4,100 rpm2,000 rpm4,350 rpm
VolvoS60 II2.4 D54,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.3 s
26.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
214 hp
160 kW
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 1 hp more than Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel.

The biggest power difference is between Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
1,608 kg
3,545 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
244 km/h
152 mph
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel6.9 s
VolvoS60 II2.4 D57.6 s

Although Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has more power, Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
1,130 km
702 mi
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
1,144 km
711 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
214 hp
160 kW
6.9 s
244 km/h
152 mph
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
Power
214 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,545 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,413 mm
55.6 in
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
Power
214 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
6.9 s
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
214 hp
160 kW
215 hp
160 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.6 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
1,608 kg
3,545 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,545 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,413 mm
55.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,130 km
702 mi
1,144 km
711 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
-
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 128 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.4 D5
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.4 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.4 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS40 II2.5 T5
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsVolkswagenJetta V2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.5T 20V
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
250 V6
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsLexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2008250 V6
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.4 GDI
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsHyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel vs Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster