Alpina D3 (E90)
Car comparison
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 DieselvsHonda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Accord VII
2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Diesel
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,070 km665 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score91/100
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Largest trunk459 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 220Nm162lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.2s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 67.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,070km665mi Calculated | 722km449mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 2,354cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,545mm179in | 4,665mm184in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,413mm56in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,510mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 459L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Diesel: Power / Torque
- Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 6,800 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 200 hp 149 kW |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 190 hp 142 kW |
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Diesel has 10 hp more than Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S and Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Diesel: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 7.4 s |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Diesel and Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Diesel and Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 1,070 km 665 mi |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 722 km 449 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Diesel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Diesel | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,070 km 665 mi | 722 km 449 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Diesel | Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Diesel
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 190 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 348 km (216 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 9 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























