Alpina B7 (G12) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Alpina B7 (G12) · Facelift 2019 4.4 V8vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
R 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B7 (G12) Facelift 2019 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful608 hp453 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score77/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight307 hp/t229 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions264 g/km
- Best estimated range721 km448 mi
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 608hp453kW | 575hp429kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,775kg6,118lb | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 42.1s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 49.5s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.0s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.0s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 289hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated | 307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated | 373Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 703km437mi Calculated | 721km448mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,268mm207in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,491mm59in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,210mm126in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,622mm64in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 515L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 265g/km | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B7 (G12) Facelift 2019 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 6,250-6,500 rpm | 3,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.0 s | 11.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 34.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.4 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.0 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 225 km/h 140 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 608 hp 453 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
Alpina B7 (G12) Facelift 2019 4.4 V8 has 33 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8 and Alpina B7 (G12) Facelift 2019 4.4 V8: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 3.6 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B7 (G12) Facelift 2019 4.4 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 289 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 703 km 437 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 721 km 448 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 608 hp 453 kW | 3.6 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B7 (G12) Facelift 2019 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | 289 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB7 (G12)Facelift 20194.4 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 608 hp 453 kW | 575 hp 429 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 703 km 437 mi | 721 km 448 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 265 g/km | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 515 L 18.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 289 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B7 (G12) Facelift 2019 4.4 V8 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B7 (G12) Facelift 2019 4.4 V8
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























