Bentley Continental GTC
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48VvsAlpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 S
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B6 Cabrio (E64)
4.4 V8 S
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Highest torque725 Nm535 lb-ft
- Lightest1,930 kg4,255 lb
- Best power-to-weight275 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption22.6 L/100 km10.4 mpg US12.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score56/100
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Best practicality score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 725Nm535lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Gross weight | 2,910kg6,415lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.0s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 78.1s99% target: 310 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 27.4L/100 km8.6mpg US10.3mpg UK | 22.6L/100 km10.4mpg US12.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 275hp/t205kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 376Nm/t251lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 370km230mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 4,398cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,807mm189in | 4,820mm190in |
| Width | 1,918mm76in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,398mm55in | 1,371mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,598mm63in |
| Max trunk volume | 235L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
- Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 S: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S | 5,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 14.3 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S | 530 hp 395 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V has 30 hp more than Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 S.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 S and Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S | 313 km/h 194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 5.1 s |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S | 4.8 s |
Although Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V has more power, Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 S is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 S and Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW | 5.1 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.8 s | 313 km/h 194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 S | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 313 km/h 194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 18.9 L/100 km 12.4 mpg US 14.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 370 km 230 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 S |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 18.9 L/100 km12.4 mpg US14.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 33.07 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 53.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,835 L749 US gal624 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,961 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 S
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 565 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 215 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























