Alpina B3 (E46)
Car comparison
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3SvsBMW 5 Series (E60) 545i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 5 Series (E60)
545i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight210 hp/t157 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score78/100
BMW 5 Series (E60) 545i
- Most powerful333 hp248 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best estimated range642 km399 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | BMW5 Series (E60)545i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305hp227kW | 333hp248kW |
| Torque | 362Nm267lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.3s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 57.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.3s Calculated | 17.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 578km359mi Calculated | 642km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,346cc204cu in | 4,398cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,471mm176in | 4,841mm191in |
| Width | 1,739mm68in | 1,846mm73in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,464mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,888mm114in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,481mm58in | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S: Power / Torque
- BMW 5 Series (E60) 545i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 6,300 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 6,100 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | BMW5 Series (E60)545i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.3 s | 17.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 178 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 305 hp 227 kW |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 333 hp 248 kW |
BMW 5 Series (E60) 545i has 28 hp more than Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S and BMW 5 Series (E60) 545i: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 5.4 s |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 5.8 s |
Although BMW 5 Series (E60) 545i has more power, Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S and BMW 5 Series (E60) 545i: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 578 km 359 mi |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 642 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 305 hp 227 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 333 hp 248 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series (E60)545i | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | BMW5 Series (E60)545i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp 227 kW | 333 hp 248 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 578 km 359 mi | 642 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S | BMW 5 Series (E60) 545i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW 5 Series (E60) 545i
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 88 Nm more
- Has 64 km (40 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























