Alpina B10 (E39)
Car comparison
Alpina B10 (E39) 4.8 i V8 32VvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W203)
AMG C 32 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B10 (E39) 4.8 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed284 km/h176 mph
- Most powerful375 hp280 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.7 L/100 km14.1 mpg US16.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 375hp280kW | 354hp264kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,115kg4,663lb |
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.5s99% target: 281 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 47.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.1s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 222hp/t165kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 539km335mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,837cc295cu in | 3,199cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,775mm188in | 4,528mm178in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,728mm68in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,830mm111in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,512mm60in | 1,493mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,518mm60in | 1,478mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B10 (E39) 4.8 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | 5,800 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 6,100 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.1 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | 375 hp 280 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW |
Alpina B10 (E39) 4.8 i V8 32V has 21 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6 and Alpina B10 (E39) 4.8 i V8 32V: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | 5.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 5.2 s |
Although Alpina B10 (E39) 4.8 i V8 32V has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6 and Alpina B10 (E39) 4.8 i V8 32V: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | 222 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | 375 hp 280 kW | 5.4 s | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB10 (E39)4.8 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 375 hp 280 kW | 354 hp 264 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 539 km 335 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 222 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B10 (E39) 4.8 i V8 32V
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























