Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6vsTesla Model X P100D 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model X
P100D 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Lightest1,830 kg4,034 lb
- Best power-to-weight279 hp/t208 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Tesla Model X P100D 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.1 s
- Most powerful611 hp456 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | TeslaModel XP100D 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 611hp456kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 2,487kg5,483lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,120kg6,878lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 45.3s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 33.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.3s Calculated | 9.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated | 246hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,891cc176cu in | - |
| Length | 4,702mm185in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | - | 1,999mm79in |
| Height | 1,681mm66in | 1,684mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,965mm117in |
| Front track | 1,622mm64in | 1,705mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,710mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 223mm9in |
| Trunk volume | - | 357L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,166L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | TeslaModel XP100D 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.3 s | 9.9 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 10.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| TeslaModel XP100D 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW |
Tesla Model X P100D 100 kWh has 101 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 and Tesla Model X P100D 100 kWh: 101 hp (75 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
| TeslaModel XP100D 100 kWh | 2,487 kg 5,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| TeslaModel XP100D 100 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 3.8 s |
| TeslaModel XP100D 100 kWh | 3.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model X P100D 100 kWh and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel XP100D 100 kWh | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| TeslaModel XP100D 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW | 3.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel XP100D 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | TeslaModel XP100D 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 611 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | 2,487 kg 5,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 357 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
- Is 657 kg lighter
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Tesla Model X P100D 100 kWh
- Has 101 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























