Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6vsTesla Model X 90D 90 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model X
90D 90 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Lightest1,830 kg4,034 lb
- Best power-to-weight279 hp/t208 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 2,389kg5,267lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,020kg6,658lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 45.3s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 55.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.3s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,891cc176cu in | - |
| Length | 4,702mm185in | 5,052mm199in |
| Width | - | 1,999mm79in |
| Height | 1,681mm66in | 1,684mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,965mm117in |
| Front track | 1,622mm64in | 1,711mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,723mm68in |
| Ground clearance | - | 223mm9in |
| Trunk volume | - | 357L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,166L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.3 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 525 hp 391 kW |
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh has 15 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 and Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 2,389 kg 5,267 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 3.8 s |
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 5.0 s |
Although Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 and Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 525 hp 391 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | 2,389 kg 5,267 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 357 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
- Is 559 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 59 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























