Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6vsTesla Model X 90D 90 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

Tesla Model X

90D 90 kWh

525 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    283 km/h
    176 mph
  • Lightest
    1,830 kg
    4,034 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    279 hp/t
    208 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    86/100
  • Best performance score
    85/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
Power
510hp380kW
525hp391kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
660Nm487lb-ft
Curb weight
1,830kg4,034lb
2,389kg5,267lb
Gross weight-
3,020kg6,658lb
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
45.3s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
55.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
5.0s
0-200 km/h
11.3s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
4.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.6s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb
Calculated
220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton
Calculated
276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
711km442mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,891cc176cu in
-
Length
4,702mm185in
5,052mm199in
Width-
1,999mm79in
Height
1,681mm66in
1,684mm66in
Wheelbase
2,818mm111in
2,965mm117in
Front track
1,622mm64in
1,711mm67in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,723mm68in
Ground clearance-
223mm9in
Trunk volume-
357L
Max trunk volume-
2,166L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
64L
-
CO2 emissions
210g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
4.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
5.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.3 s
16.3 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
8.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.6 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
203 km/h
126 mph
181 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
510 hp
380 kW
TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
525 hp
391 kW

Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh has 15 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 and Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
660 Nm
487 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
2,389 kg
5,267 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
283 km/h
176 mph
TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 and Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh: 1.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
510 hp
380 kW
3.8 s
283 km/h
176 mph
TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
525 hp
391 kW
5.0 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,681 mm
66.2 in
TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
357 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
5,052 mm
198.9 in
Height
1,684 mm
66.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
Power
510 hp
380 kW
525 hp
391 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
5.0 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
2,389 kg
5,267 lb
Fuel consumption
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,681 mm
66.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
357 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
5,052 mm
198.9 in
Height
1,684 mm
66.3 in
Range score
711 km
442 mi
-
CO2 score
210 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
357 L
12.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Consumption9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.35 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,363 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6

  • Is 559 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 59 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 vs Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster