Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014

Turbo S 4.8 V8

570 hp4806 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2015-2017
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Lightest
    1,830 kg
    4,034 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    279 hp/t
    208 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.7 L/100 km
    20.1 mpg US
    24.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    210 g/km
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    284 km/h
    176 mph
  • Most powerful
    570 hp
    425 kW
  • Highest torque
    800 Nm
    590 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    870 km
    540 mi
  • Best overall score
    87/100
  • Best performance score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Power
570hp425kW
510hp380kW
Torque
800Nm590lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
2,235kg4,927lb
1,830kg4,034lb
Gross weight
2,900kg6,393lb
-
Top speed
284 km/h
176 mph
283 km/h
176 mph
To 99% top speed
57.7s99% target: 281 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
45.3s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
3.8s
0-200 km/h
13.0s
Calculated
11.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
3.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb
Calculated
279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton
Calculated
328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
870km540mi
Calculated
711km442mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,806cc293cu in
2,891cc176cu in
Length
4,855mm191in
4,702mm185in
Width
1,954mm77in
-
Height
1,702mm67in
1,681mm66in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
2,818mm111in
Front track
1,661mm65in
1,622mm64in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,675mm66in
Trunk volume
670L
-
Max trunk volume
1,780L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
100L
64L
CO2 emissions
267g/km
210g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V86,000 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V66,500 rpm2,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
3.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
3.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.0 s
11.3 s
Top speed
284 km/h
176 mph
283 km/h
176 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
193 km/h
120 mph
203 km/h
126 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
570 hp
425 kW
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
510 hp
380 kW

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 has 60 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
2,235 kg
4,927 lb
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
1,830 kg
4,034 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
284 km/h
176 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
283 km/h
176 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V84.1 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V63.8 s

Although Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
870 km
540 mi
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
711 km
442 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
570 hp
425 kW
4.1 s
284 km/h
176 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
510 hp
380 kW
3.8 s
283 km/h
176 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
284 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,681 mm
66.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
284 km/h
176 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
4.1 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
3.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
3.8 s
Top speed
284 km/h
176 mph
283 km/h
176 mph
Lightness
2,235 kg
4,927 lb
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,681 mm
66.2 in
Range score
870 km
540 mi
711 km
442 mi
CO2 score
267 g/km
210 g/km
Trunk score
670 L
23.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km15.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi25.35 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year2,363 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8

  • Has 60 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6

  • Is 405 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 57 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6vsJaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo S 4.8 V8
Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
GTS 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
GTS 3.8 V8
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6vsMaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.5 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Turbo S 4.5 V8
Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
SVR 5.0i V8
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
Turbo S 4.8 V8
4.4 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster