Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Lightest1,830 kg4,034 lb
- Best power-to-weight279 hp/t208 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Best estimated range746 km463 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,428kg5,353lb | 1,830kg4,034lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 44.9s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.5s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km463mi Calculated | 653km406mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 2,891cc176cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,818mm111in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,774L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,960-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.5 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 116 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 has 40 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 2,428 kg 5,353 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 3.8 s |
Although Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 746 km 463 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 653 km 406 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.5 s | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,428 kg 5,353 lb | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 463 mi | 653 km 406 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 93 km (58 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
- Is 598 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























