AUDI Q3 II (F3)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.2 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions145 g/km
- Best estimated range1,055 km655 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score89/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | - |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.1s Calculated | 48.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 800km497mi Calculated | 1,055km655mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,484mm177in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,856mm73in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 530L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 170g/km | 145g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.1 s | 48.2 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 800 km 497 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,055 km 655 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 800 km 497 mi | 1,055 km 655 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 170 g/km | 145 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Has 200 Nm more
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 255 km (158 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























