Volkswagen T-Roc I
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0 GME
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score89/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | - |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 76.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 40.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 790km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,234mm167in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,573mm62in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,590mm102in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 161mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 445L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 187g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 40.1 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME has 10 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 7.2 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 790 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 790 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 187 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























