Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.0 GME

200 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    216 km/h
    134 mph
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    809 km
    503 mi
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
Power
190hp142kW
200hp149kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,420kg3,131lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight
1,990kg4,387lb
-
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
76.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
35.7s
Calculated
40.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
809km503mi
Calculated
790km491mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,234mm167in
4,686mm184in
Width
1,819mm72in
1,903mm75in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,693mm67in
Wheelbase
2,590mm102in
2,818mm111in
Front track
1,546mm61in
-
Rear track
1,541mm61in
-
Ground clearance
161mm6in
-
Trunk volume
445L
-
Max trunk volume
1,290L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
64L
CO2 emissions-
187g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GMEPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME4,500 rpm1,750 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.7 s
40.1 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
200 hp
149 kW

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME has 10 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
216 km/h
134 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI7.2 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME7.2 s

Although Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
809 km
503 mi
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
790 km
491 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
200 hp
149 kW
7.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.2 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
Power
190 hp
142 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Range score
809 km
503 mi
790 km
491 mi
CO2 score
-
187 g/km
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Is 240 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME - car comparison - FastVsFaster