AUDI SQ2 · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI SQ2 · Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0 GME
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score86/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
- Best estimated range800 km497 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 65.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,216mm166in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,802mm71in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,524mm60in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,594mm102in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,551mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 355L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,000L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 280 hp 209 kW |
AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME and AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 4.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
- Has 86 km (53 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























