Car comparison

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8vsAlfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150)

4.2 V8

298 hp4196 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2006-2009
VS

Alfa Romeo Spider (939)

3.2 V6

260 hp3195 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2006-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    298 hp
    222 kW
  • Highest torque
    411 Nm
    303 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    180 hp/t
    134 kW/t
    5.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.3 L/100 km
    20.8 mpg US
    25.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    629 km
    391 mi
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
Power
298hp222kW
260hp194kW
Torque
411Nm303lb-ft
322Nm237lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Gross weight
2,075kg4,575lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
89.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
94.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
23.2s
Calculated
32.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
180hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
629km391mi
Calculated
609km378mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,196cc256cu in
3,195cc195cu in
Length
4,791mm189in
4,393mm173in
Width-
1,830mm72in
Height
1,329mm52in
1,318mm52in
Wheelbase
2,752mm108in
2,528mm100in
Front track-
1,579mm62in
Rear track-
1,559mm61in
Ground clearance
120mm5in
-
Trunk volume
200L
253L
Max trunk volume
283L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
71L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V86,000 rpm4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V66,200 rpm4,500 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.2 s
32.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
298 hp
222 kW
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
260 hp
194 kW

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 has 38 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 and Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
411 Nm
303 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
322 Nm
237 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
1,690 kg
3,726 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V86.3 s
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V67.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
180 hp/t
134 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
629 km
391 mi
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
609 km
378 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
298 hp
222 kW
6.3 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
260 hp
194 kW
7.0 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
Power
298 hp
222 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
253 L
8.9 cu ft
Length
4,393 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,318 mm
51.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
Power
298 hp
222 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
6.3 s
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
180 hp/t
134 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6
Power
298 hp
222 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
411 Nm
303 lb-ft
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,690 kg
3,726 lb
Fuel consumption
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
253 L
8.9 cu ft
Length
4,393 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,318 mm
51.9 in
Range score
629 km
391 mi
609 km
378 mi
Trunk score
200 L
7.1 cu ft
253 L
8.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
180 hp/t
134 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
Consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.78 LC100 km20.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.82 LC100 mi32.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,966 LC/year3,019 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8

  • Has 38 hp more
  • Has 89 Nm more
  • Is 30 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 21 km (13 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6

  • Has 53 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.2 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8
3.2 V6
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
4.2 V8
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8
3.2 V6
3.0 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
4.2 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8
3.2 V6
630i
VS
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007630i
4.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.2 V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6vsAUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)3.2 FSI V6
4.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.2 V6
330i
VS
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6vsBMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330i
3.2 V6
630i
VS
Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i
4.2 V8
4.6 i V8 24V
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8vsFordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 vs Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster