Car comparison

Mini Hatch (F55) · Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0vsAlfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Hatch (F55) · Facelift 2018

Cooper SD 2.0

170 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2018-2019
VS

Alfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2016

1.4 TB MultiAir

170 hp1368 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    170 hp
    127 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.9 L/100 km
    60.3 mpg US
    72.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,048 km
    651 mi
  • Largest trunk
    278 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    70/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170hp127kW
170hp127kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,295kg2,855lb
1,170kg2,579lb
Gross weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,650kg3,638lb
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
77.7s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
34.4s
Calculated
35.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,048km651mi
Calculated
833km518mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,368cc83cu in
Length
4,005mm158in
4,063mm160in
Width
1,727mm68in
1,720mm68in
Height
1,425mm56in
1,446mm57in
Wheelbase
2,567mm101in
2,511mm99in
Front track
1,485mm58in
1,475mm58in
Rear track
1,485mm58in
1,469mm58in
Ground clearance
146mm6in
-
Trunk volume
278L
270L
Max trunk volume
941L
950L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
44L
45L
CO2 emissions
112g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAirPowerTorque
  • Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir5,500 rpm2,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.4 s
35.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
170 hp
127 kW
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
170 hp
127 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
1,295 kg
2,855 lb
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
1,170 kg
2,579 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
223 km/h
139 mph
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.07.3 s
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 and Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 and Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
1,048 km
651 mi
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
833 km
518 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
170 hp
127 kW
7.3 s
223 km/h
139 mph
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,005 mm
157.7 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,063 mm
160.0 in
Height
1,446 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
7.3 s
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170 hp
127 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.4 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
1,295 kg
2,855 lb
1,170 kg
2,579 lb
Fuel consumption
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,005 mm
157.7 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,063 mm
160.0 in
Height
1,446 mm
56.9 in
Range score
1,048 km
651 mi
833 km
518 mi
CO2 score
112 g/km
-
Trunk score
278 L
9.8 cu ft
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir
Consumption4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.35 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi11.83 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used630 L166 US gal139 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,103 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 214 km (133 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 8 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TP
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.4 MultiAir
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
1.4 TB MultiAir
XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAbarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper C 1.5
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5
1.4 TB MultiAir
Turismo 1.4 T-Jet
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAbarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet
Mini Hatch (F55) · Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir - car comparison - FastVsFaster