Alfa Romeo GTV (916)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6vsVolvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C30
2.5 i 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk233 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,437kg3,168lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.5s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 86.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 713km443mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,285mm169in | 4,252mm167in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,499mm59in | 1,548mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,544mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 155L | 233L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 208g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 has 2 hp more than Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6.7 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 6.7 s |
Although Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 has more power, Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.7 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 713 km 443 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 208 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 155 L 5.5 cu ft | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Is 22 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 55 Nm more
- Has 78 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























