Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016
2.0 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted232 km/h144 mph Restricted
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions113 g/km
- Best estimated range1,395 km867 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 175hp130kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | 1,912kg4,215lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph Calculated | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 82.0s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.6s Calculated | 39.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | 1,395km867mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,956cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,351mm171in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,364mm93in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,554mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 119g/km | 113g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.6 s | 39.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph Likely limited | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 175 hp 130 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI has 9 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 7.8 s |
Although Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,111 km 690 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 1,395 km 867 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 175 hp 130 kW | 7.8 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 175 hp 130 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | 1,395 km 867 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 119 g/km | 113 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 284 km (177 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























