Infiniti Q30
Car comparison
Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDIvsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016
2.0 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Most powerful175 hp130 kW
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions113 g/km
- Best estimated range1,395 km867 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 175hp130kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,485kg3,274lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | - |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 81.4s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.9s Calculated | 39.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 1,395km867mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,956cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,351mm171in |
| Width | 1,805mm71in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,495mm59in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,364mm93in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,573mm62in | 1,554mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 116g/km | 113g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 3,400-4,000 rpm | 1,400-3,400 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.9 s | 39.1 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 175 hp 130 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM has 5 hp more than Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 8.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM and Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 1,395 km 867 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.3 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 175 hp 130 kW | 7.8 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 175 hp 130 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 1,395 km 867 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 116 g/km | 113 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 2.0 JTDM
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 259 km (161 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























