AUDI A1 (8X)
Car comparison
AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSIvsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940)
1.750 TBi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range789 km491 mi
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score73/100
AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful256 hp191 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t137 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 256hp191kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 26.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 184hp/t137kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 178hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 523km325mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 3,987mm157in | 4,351mm171in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,469mm97in | 2,634mm104in |
| Front track | 1,463mm58in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,450mm57in | 1,554mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 210L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 860L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 5,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 26.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 256 hp 191 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 235 hp 175 kW |
AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI has 21 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi and AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 5.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi and AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 523 km 325 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 256 hp 191 kW | 5.7 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 235 hp 175 kW | 6.8 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 256 hp 191 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 523 km 325 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 266 km (165 mi) more estimated range
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























