Mini Hatch (F56)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0vsAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940)
1.750 TBi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Lightest1,220 kg2,690 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score91/100
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Best estimated range857 km533 mi
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,220kg2,690lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.9s Calculated | 22.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 772km480mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 3,874mm153in | 4,351mm171in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,634mm104in |
| Front track | 1,485mm58in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,554mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 211L | 350L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 133g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 5,200-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 5,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.9 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 240 hp 179 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi has 9 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 6.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi and Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 772 km 480 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.1 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.0 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 772 km 480 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 133 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.750 TBi
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 85 km (53 mi) more estimated range
- Has 139 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























