Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJetvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
C 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range945 km587 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score92/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 194hp145kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,245kg4,949lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 62.3s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.7s Calculated | 25.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 945km587mi Calculated | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,650mm183in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | 145g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | - | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 3,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.7 s | 25.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 210 hp 157 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 194 hp 145 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet has 16 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 6.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 945 km 587 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 745 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 194 hp 145 kW | 6.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 194 hp 145 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 945 km 587 mi | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 145 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 200 km (124 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























