Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 30tvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

30t

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2020
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.0 Turbo

280 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 30t

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    171 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    987 km
    613 mi
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)30tAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
300hp224kW
280hp209kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,711kg3,772lb
1,530kg3,373lb
Gross weight
2,330kg5,137lb
2,105kg4,641lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
49.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
18.4s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
234Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
987km613mi
Calculated
753km468mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,643mm183in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,438mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,820mm111in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,556mm61in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Trunk volume-
480L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
58L
CO2 emissions
171g/km
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 30tAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 TurboPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 30t: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)30t5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo5,250 rpm2,250 rpm5,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)30tAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.4 s
16.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
175 km/h
109 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)30t
300 hp
224 kW
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
280 hp
209 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 30t has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Jaguar XF (X260) 30t: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)30t
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)30t
1,711 kg
3,772 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
1,530 kg
3,373 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)30t
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)30t5.9 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo5.2 s

Although Jaguar XF (X260) 30t has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Jaguar XF (X260) 30t: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)30t
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)30t
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
183 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)30t
987 km
613 mi
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
753 km
468 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)30t
300 hp
224 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
280 hp
209 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)30t
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)30t
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)30t
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
5.9 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)30t
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
183 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)30tAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
300 hp
224 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,711 kg
3,772 lb
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Range score
987 km
613 mi
753 km
468 mi
CO2 score
171 g/km
178 g/km
Trunk score
-
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
183 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 30tAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 30t

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 233 km (145 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 7 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo

  • Is 181 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 30t
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

30t
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)30tvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 Turbo
2.0 Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo
30t
30t
VS
JaguarXF (X260)30tvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI
30t
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)30tvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 Turbo
330d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)330d
30t
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)30tvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 Turbo
50 TDI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAUDIA8 (D5)50 TDI V6
30t
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)30tvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 Turbo
50 TDI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAUDIA8L (D5)50 TDI V6
30t
P300
VS
JaguarXF (X260)30tvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300
2.0 Turbo
50 TDI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)50 TDI V6
Jaguar XF (X260) 30t vs Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster