Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 P300vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight196 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P300
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,558kg3,435lb | 1,429kg3,150lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 48.3s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 690km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,678mm184in | 4,650mm183in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P300: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.2 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 183 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 280 hp 209 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P300 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P300: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | 1,558 kg 3,435 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | 5.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 5.2 s |
Although Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P300 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P300: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,558 kg 3,435 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 690 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P300
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
- Is 129 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























