Bentley Continental GT III
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12vsAlfa Romeo 33 Stradale 102 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 33 Stradale
102 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Alfa Romeo 33 Stradale 102 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Most powerful750 hp559 kW
- Lightest2,100 kg4,630 lb
- Best power-to-weight357 hp/t266 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | Alfa Romeo33 Stradale102 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 659hp491kW | 750hp559kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 2,273kg5,011lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Gross weight | 2,725kg6,008lb | - |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.5s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 49.8s99% target: 322 km/h / 200 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.3s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 357hp/t266kW/t162hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | - |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,637mm183in |
| Width | - | 1,966mm77in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,226mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,668mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 358L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | Alfa Romeo33 Stradale102 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.3 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 42.2 s | 50.3 s |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 10.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 659 hp 491 kW |
| Alfa Romeo33 Stradale102 kWh | 750 hp 559 kW |
Alfa Romeo 33 Stradale 102 kWh has 91 hp more than Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12 and Alfa Romeo 33 Stradale 102 kWh: 91 hp (68 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb |
| Alfa Romeo33 Stradale102 kWh | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| Alfa Romeo33 Stradale102 kWh | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 3.6 s |
| Alfa Romeo33 Stradale102 kWh | 3.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 33 Stradale 102 kWh and Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo33 Stradale102 kWh | 357 hp/t 266 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 659 hp 491 kW | 3.6 s | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| Alfa Romeo33 Stradale102 kWh | 750 hp 559 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo33 Stradale102 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | Alfa Romeo33 Stradale102 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 659 hp 491 kW | 750 hp 559 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 357 hp/t 266 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo 33 Stradale 102 kWh
- Has 91 hp more
- Is 173 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 67 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























