Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6vsAUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6)
3.2 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range741 km460 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,590 kg3,505 lb
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 256hp191kW |
| Torque | 322Nm237lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 77.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.4s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 622km386mi Calculated | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,195cc195cu in | 3,123cc191cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,934mm194in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,862mm73in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,519mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,833mm112in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,660L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 262g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.4 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 256 hp 191 kW |
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 has 4 hp more than AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 7.2 s |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 7.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 622 km 386 mi |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 741 km 460 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.2 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 256 hp 191 kW | 7.2 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 256 hp 191 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 622 km 386 mi | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 262 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 | AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 8 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 119 km (74 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























