Car comparison

Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6vsAlfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb II Combi

3.6 FSI V6

260 hp3597 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2009-2013
VS

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon

3.2 JTS V6

260 hp3195 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2007-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    247 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,671 kg
    3,684 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    156 hp/t
    116 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.4 L/100 km
    16.3 mpg US
    19.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    588 km
    366 mi
  • Largest trunk
    633 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
Power
260hp194kW
260hp194kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
322Nm237lb-ft
Curb weight
1,671kg3,684lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Gross weight
2,307kg5,086lb
2,230kg4,916lb
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
242 km/h
150 mph
To 99% top speed
68.7s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
72.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
23.0s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
588km366mi
Calculated
566km351mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,597cc220cu in
3,195cc195cu in
Length
4,838mm190in
4,660mm183in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,510mm59in
1,422mm56in
Wheelbase
2,761mm109in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,578mm62in
Rear track
1,517mm60in
1,555mm61in
Ground clearance
141mm6in
-
Trunk volume
633L
445L
Max trunk volume
1,865L
1,235L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
69L
CO2 emissions-
288g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6PowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V66,000 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V66,300 rpm4,500 rpm6,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.0 s
25.9 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
242 km/h
150 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
260 hp
194 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
322 Nm
237 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
1,671 kg
3,684 lb
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
1,680 kg
3,704 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
247 km/h
153 mph
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
242 km/h
150 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
588 km
366 mi
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
566 km
351 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW
6.6 s
247 km/h
153 mph
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
260 hp
194 kW
7.3 s
242 km/h
150 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,510 mm
59.4 in
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,422 mm
56.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK

Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
6.6 s
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
242 km/h
150 mph
Lightness
1,671 kg
3,684 lb
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
Fuel consumption
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,510 mm
59.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,422 mm
56.0 in
Range score
588 km
366 mi
566 km
351 mi
CO2 score
-
288 g/km
Trunk score
633 L
22.4 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
Consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.85 LC100 km21.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.73 LC100 mi34.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,678 LC/year3,203 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6

  • Has 28 Nm more
  • Is 9 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 188 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6 vs Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster