Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6vsAUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6)
3.2 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 256hp191kW |
| Torque | 322Nm237lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Gross weight | 2,230kg4,916lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 82.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 29.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 566km351mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,195cc195cu in | 3,123cc191cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,934mm194in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,862mm73in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,519mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,833mm112in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,660L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 288g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 29.1 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 256 hp 191 kW |
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 has 4 hp more than AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 7.3 s |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 and AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 566 km 351 mi |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.3 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 256 hp 191 kW | 7.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | AUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 256 hp 191 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 566 km 351 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 288 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 | AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A6 allroad (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 8 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 162 km (100 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























