Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20VvsVolkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf V Variant
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range946 km588 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score87/100
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
- Lightest1,362 kg3,003 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 1,362kg3,003lb |
| Gross weight | 2,245kg4,949lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 76.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.8s Calculated | 37.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 946km588mi Calculated | 753km468mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,387cc146cu in | 1,390cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,556mm179in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,504mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,508mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,495L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.8 s | 37.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V has 40 hp more than Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 1,362 kg 3,003 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 8.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 946 km 588 mi |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 753 km 468 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | 1,362 kg 3,003 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 946 km 588 mi | 753 km 468 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V | Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 193 km (120 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
- Is 333 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























