Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20VvsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III Grandtour
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Lightest1,613 kg3,556 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range985 km612 mi
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 1,613kg3,556lb |
| Gross weight | 2,245kg4,949lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 77.3s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.8s Calculated | 44.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 946km588mi Calculated | 985km612mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,387cc146cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 508L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.8 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V has 32 hp more than Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: 32 hp (24 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 8.5 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 946 km 588 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 985 km 612 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.7 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 946 km 588 mi | 985 km 612 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Has 32 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Is 82 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
- Has 63 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























