Lexus IS II (XE20)
Car comparison
Lexus IS II (XE20) 250 V6vsAlfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 159
2.4 JTDM 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range972 km604 mi
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Lexus IS II (XE20) 250 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 208hp155kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 252Nm186lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,195kg4,839lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.4s Calculated | 32.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 663km412mi Calculated | 972km604mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,500cc153cu in | 2,387cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,575mm180in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,422mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 378L | 405L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 192g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus IS II (XE20) 250 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.4 s | 32.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Limited | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 208 hp 155 kW |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V has 2 hp more than Lexus IS II (XE20) 250 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus IS II (XE20) 250 V6 and Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 252 Nm 186 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 8.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 8.3 s |
Although Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V has more power, Lexus IS II (XE20) 250 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus IS II (XE20) 250 V6 and Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V and Lexus IS II (XE20) 250 V6: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 663 km 412 mi |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 972 km 604 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 208 hp 155 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.3 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusIS II (XE20)250 V6 | Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 208 hp 155 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 252 Nm 186 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 663 km 412 mi | 972 km 604 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 192 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 378 L 13.3 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus IS II (XE20) 250 V6 | Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus IS II (XE20) 250 V6
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 148 Nm more
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 309 km (192 mi) more estimated range
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























