Volvo S40 II
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5vsAlfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003
2.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range611 km379 mi
- Largest trunk404 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 218Nm161lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 67.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 25.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 611km379mi Calculated | 534km332mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,492cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,476mm176in | 4,435mm175in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,745mm69in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 378L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 227g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 25.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 192 hp 143 kW |
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 has 28 hp more than Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V and Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 218 Nm 161 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 6.8 s |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 611 km 379 mi |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 534 km 332 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 218 Nm 161 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 611 km 379 mi | 534 km 332 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 227 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 378 L 13.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 | Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 102 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 77 km (48 mi) more estimated range
- Has 26 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
- Is 140 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























