AUDI SQ8 e-tron
Car comparison
AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWhvsAITO M9 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAITO M9
100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque973 Nm718 lb-ft
- Largest trunk569 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score87/100
AITO M9 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Lightest2,560 kg5,644 lb
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t154 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | AITOM9100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 503hp375kW | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 973Nm718lb-ft | 673Nm496lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,650kg5,842lb | 2,560kg5,644lb |
| Gross weight | 3,290kg7,253lb | 3,010kg6,636lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 45.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 38.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 367Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,915mm194in | 5,230mm206in |
| Width | 1,976mm78in | 1,999mm79in |
| Height | 1,631mm64in | 1,800mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,928mm115in | 3,110mm122in |
| Front track | 1,683mm66in | 1,707mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,683mm66in | 1,713mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 569L | 206L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,637L | 716L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | AITOM9100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 503 hp 375 kW |
| AITOM9100 kWh | 530 hp 395 kW |
AITO M9 100 kWh has 27 hp more than AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh and AITO M9 100 kWh: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 973 Nm 718 lb-ft |
| AITOM9100 kWh | 673 Nm 496 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 2,650 kg 5,842 lb |
| AITOM9100 kWh | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AITOM9100 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 4.5 s |
| AITOM9100 kWh | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AITO M9 100 kWh and AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| AITOM9100 kWh | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 503 hp 375 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AITOM9100 kWh | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AITOM9100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | AITOM9100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 503 hp 375 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 973 Nm 718 lb-ft | 673 Nm 496 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,650 kg 5,842 lb | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 569 L 20.1 cu ft | 206 L 7.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh
- Has 300 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 363 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
AITO M9 100 kWh
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























