Polestar 3
111 kWh
517 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2022-2025
Car comparison
Polestar 3 111 kWhvsAITO M7 II 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
AITO M7 II
100 kWh
526 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2025-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Polestar 3 111 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque910 Nm671 lb-ft
- Largest trunk484 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score84/100
AITO M7 II 100 kWh
- Most powerful526 hp392 kW
- Lightest2,635 kg5,809 lb
- Best power-to-weight200 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Polestar3111 kWh | AITOM7 II100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 517hp386kW | 526hp392kW |
| Torque | 910Nm671lb-ft | 597Nm440lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 2,635kg5,809lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,130kg6,900lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 41.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.7s Calculated | 26.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 194hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,900mm193in | 5,080mm200in |
| Width | 2,120mm83in | 1,999mm79in |
| Height | 1,627mm64in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,985mm118in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | - | 1,716mm68in |
| Rear track | - | 1,727mm68in |
| Ground clearance | 211mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 333L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,411L | 2,252L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Polestar3111 kWh | AITOM7 II100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.7 s | 26.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 517 hp 386 kW |
| AITOM7 II100 kWh | 526 hp 392 kW |
AITO M7 II 100 kWh has 9 hp more than Polestar 3 111 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Polestar 3 111 kWh and AITO M7 II 100 kWh: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 910 Nm 671 lb-ft |
| AITOM7 II100 kWh | 597 Nm 440 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 2,670 kg 5,886 lb |
| AITOM7 II100 kWh | 2,635 kg 5,809 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AITOM7 II100 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 4.7 s |
| AITOM7 II100 kWh | 4.7 s |
Although AITO M7 II 100 kWh has more power, Polestar 3 111 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| AITOM7 II100 kWh | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AITOM7 II100 kWh | 526 hp 392 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AITOM7 II100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Polestar3111 kWh | AITOM7 II100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 517 hp 386 kW | 526 hp 392 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 910 Nm 671 lb-ft | 597 Nm 440 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,670 kg 5,886 lb | 2,635 kg 5,809 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 333 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Polestar 3 111 kWh
- Has 313 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 151 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
AITO M7 II 100 kWh
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Polestar 3 111 kWh
AITO M7 II 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Polestar3111 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
AITOM7 II100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 580 V8
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDISQ8 e-tron Sportback114 kWh
AITOM7 II100 kWhvsMaseratiGrecaleFolgore 105 kWh
Polestar3111 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh
AITOM7 II100 kWhvsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Folgore 105 kWh
AITOM7 II100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach GLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 600 V8
Polestar3111 kWhvsTeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh
AITOM7 II100 kWhvsPolestar3111 kWh
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDIe-tronS 95 kWh