Cadillac BLS
Car comparison
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6vsAcura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura TL III (UA6/7)
3.2 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful261 hp195 kW
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 261hp195kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 316Nm233lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 3,210cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,680mm184in | 4,808mm189in |
| Width | 1,752mm69in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 354L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 245g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
- Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 261 hp 195 kW |
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V has 6 hp more than Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 316 Nm 233 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 6.9 s |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 261 hp 195 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 261 hp 195 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 316 Nm 233 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 245 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 354 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 49 Nm more
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 71 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























