AUDI A6 (4F/C6)
Car comparison
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6vsAcura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura TL III (UA6/7)
3.2 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk546 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful261 hp195 kW
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 261hp195kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 316Nm233lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 734km456mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,123cc191cu in | 3,210cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,916mm194in | 4,808mm189in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,843mm112in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,612mm63in | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 354L |
| Max trunk volume | 546L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 262g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 261 hp 195 kW |
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V has 6 hp more than AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 316 Nm 233 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 6.8 s |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V and AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 261 hp 195 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 261 hp 195 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 316 Nm 233 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 734 km 456 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 262 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 546 L 19.3 cu ft | 354 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 14 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 192 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























