Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018 C 200vsAbarth Fastback 1.3 T270
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth Fastback
1.3 T270
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score89/100
Abarth Fastback 1.3 T270
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,299 kg2,864 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score57/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | AbarthFastback1.3 T270 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,299kg2,864lb |
| Gross weight | 1,985kg4,376lb | 1,699kg3,746lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.8s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.5s Calculated | 39.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,497cc91cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,544mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,532mm100in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,484mm58in |
| Rear track | - | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 88mm3in | 187mm7in |
| Trunk volume | - | 600L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,087L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 148g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200: Power / Torque
- Abarth Fastback 1.3 T270: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | - | 3,000-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AbarthFastback1.3 T270 | 5,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | AbarthFastback1.3 T270 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.5 s | 39.1 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| AbarthFastback1.3 T270 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200 has 4 hp more than Abarth Fastback 1.3 T270.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth Fastback 1.3 T270 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AbarthFastback1.3 T270 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| AbarthFastback1.3 T270 | 1,299 kg 2,864 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| AbarthFastback1.3 T270 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 7.9 s |
| AbarthFastback1.3 T270 | 7.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200 has more power, Abarth Fastback 1.3 T270 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth Fastback 1.3 T270 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| AbarthFastback1.3 T270 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| AbarthFastback1.3 T270 | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AbarthFastback1.3 T270 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200 | AbarthFastback1.3 T270 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,299 kg 2,864 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 148 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 600 L 21.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 200
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Abarth Fastback 1.3 T270
- Is 131 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























