AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) · Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSIvsAbarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595C
1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range940 km584 mi
- Largest trunk320 L
- Best overall score45/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,075 kg2,370 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,075kg2,370lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 103.3s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 54.2s Calculated | 54.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 940km584mi Calculated | 538km335mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 4,626mm182in | 3,657mm144in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,751mm108in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,409mm55in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,402mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 320L | 182L |
| Max trunk volume | 750L | 520L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 4,000-6,200 rpm | 1,400-3,850 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 54.2 s | 54.7 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW |
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI has 17 hp more than Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet and AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 8.9 s |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 7.4 s |
Although AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI has more power, Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet and AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 940 km 584 mi |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 538 km 335 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.9 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 940 km 584 mi | 538 km 335 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | 182 L 6.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI | Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 402 km (250 mi) more estimated range
- Has 138 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
- Is 580 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























