Abarth 595C · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Abarth 595C · Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet · Stage 3vsAbarth 595C · Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet · Stage 2vsAbarth 595C · Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet · Stage 1vsAbarth 595C · Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595C · Facelift 2016
1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)
Abarth 595C · Facelift 2016
1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)
Abarth 595C · Facelift 2016
1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 217 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful217 hp162 kW
- Highest torque319 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,085 kg2,392 lb
- Best power-to-weight200 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range603 km375 mi
- Largest trunk185 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 217hp162kW+72 hp | 188hp141kW+43 hp | 171hp128kW+26 hp | 145hp108kW |
| Torque | 319Nm236lb-ft+113 Nm | 278Nm205lb-ft+72 Nm | 251Nm185lb-ft+45 Nm | 206Nm152lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,085kg2,392lb | 1,085kg2,392lb | 1,085kg2,392lb | 1,085kg2,392lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph-9.4 s Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph-5.6 s Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph-2.7 s Calculated | 81.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s-1.8 s | 6.8s-1.2 s | 7.2s-0.8 s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.7s-26.1 s Calculated | 29.1s-20.7 s Calculated | 33.8s-16.0 s Calculated | 49.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s-1.7 s Calculated | 6.4s-1.1 s Calculated | 6.8s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s-1.5 s Calculated | 14.8s-1.0 s Calculated | 15.2s-0.6 s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 603km375mi Calculated | 603km375mi Calculated | 603km375mi Calculated | 603km375mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,660mm144in | 3,660mm144in | 3,660mm144in | 3,660mm144in |
| Width | 1,627mm64in | 1,627mm64in | 1,627mm64in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,415mm56in | 1,415mm56in | 1,415mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,408mm55in | 1,408mm55in | 1,408mm55in | 1,408mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 185L | 185L | 185L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 35L | 35L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | 134g/km | 134g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 217 hp: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 188 hp: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1) 171 hp: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet 145 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.4 s | 6.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.8 s | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.7 s | 29.1 s | 33.8 s | 49.8 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.8 s | 15.2 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 217 hp 162 kW |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 188 hp 141 kW |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 171 hp 128 kW |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 145 hp 108 kW |
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 217 hp has 72 hp more than Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet 145 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet 145 hp and Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 217 hp: 72 hp (54 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 319 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 278 Nm 205 lb-ft |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 251 Nm 185 lb-ft |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 206 Nm 152 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 6.2 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 6.8 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 7.2 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 217 hp and Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet 145 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 188 hp and Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1) 171 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 603 km 375 mi |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 603 km 375 mi |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 603 km 375 mi |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 603 km 375 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 217 hp 162 kW | 6.2 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 188 hp 141 kW | 6.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 171 hp 128 kW | 7.2 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 145 hp 108 kW | 8.0 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 217 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 3)217 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 2)188 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet (Stage 1)171 hp | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet145 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 217 hp 162 kW | 188 hp 141 kW | 171 hp 128 kW | 145 hp 108 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 319 Nm 236 lb-ft | 278 Nm 205 lb-ft | 251 Nm 185 lb-ft | 206 Nm 152 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.8 s | 7.2 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 603 km 375 mi | 603 km 375 mi | 603 km 375 mi | 603 km 375 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | 134 g/km | 134 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 217 hp | Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 188 hp | Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 1) 171 hp | Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet 145 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 3) 217 hp
- Has 29 hp more
- Has 41 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet (Stage 2) 188 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























