Abarth 595 · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Abarth 595 · Facelift 2016 Turismo 1.4 T-JetvsAbarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595C
1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Turismo 1.4 T-Jet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful165 hp123 kW
- Highest torque230 Nm170 lb-ft
- Largest trunk185 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
- Lightest1,075 kg2,370 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range538 km335 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 165hp123kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,110kg2,447lb | 1,075kg2,370lb |
| Gross weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.1s Calculated | 54.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 515km320mi Calculated | 538km335mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,660mm144in | 3,657mm144in |
| Width | 1,627mm64in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,415mm56in | 1,409mm55in |
| Rear track | 1,408mm55in | 1,402mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 182L |
| Max trunk volume | 610L | 520L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Turismo 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.1 s | 54.7 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 165 hp 123 kW |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW |
Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Turismo 1.4 T-Jet has 5 hp more than Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Turismo 1.4 T-Jet: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 7.3 s |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Turismo 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 515 km 320 mi |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 538 km 335 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 165 hp 123 kW | 7.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Turismo 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth595Facelift 2016Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 165 hp 123 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 515 km 320 mi | 538 km 335 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 182 L 6.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Turismo 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Turismo 1.4 T-Jet
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























