Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsAbarth 595 · Facelift 2016 Competizione 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595 · Facelift 2016
Competizione 1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted232 km/h144 mph Restricted
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions119 g/km
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Competizione 1.4 T-Jet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Lightest1,055 kg2,326 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,055kg2,326lb |
| Gross weight | 1,912kg4,215lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 93.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.6s Calculated | 27.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | 515km320mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 3,660mm144in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,415mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,408mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 185L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 119g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Competizione 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.6 s | 27.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 180 hp 134 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Competizione 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Competizione 1.4 T-Jet and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 1,055 kg 2,326 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 6.9 s |
Although Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI has more power, Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Competizione 1.4 T-Jet is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Competizione 1.4 T-Jet and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Competizione 1.4 T-Jet: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,111 km 690 mi |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 515 km 320 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 180 hp 134 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Abarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,055 kg 2,326 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | 515 km 320 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 119 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI | Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Competizione 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 596 km (371 mi) more estimated range
- Has 405 L more trunk volume
- Emits 36 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Competizione 1.4 T-Jet
- Is 315 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























