Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 · Stage 3vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 · Stage 2vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 · Stage 1vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 D4 (Stage 2)
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 D4 (Stage 1)
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 281 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed268 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful281 hp209 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lightest1,626 kg3,585 lb
- Best power-to-weight173 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,646 km1,023 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 281hp209kW+100 hp | 244hp182kW+63 hp | 217hp162kW+36 hp | 181hp135kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft+240 Nm | 560Nm413lb-ft+160 Nm | 500Nm369lb-ft+100 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,626kg3,585lb | 1,626kg3,585lb | 1,626kg3,585lb | 1,626kg3,585lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 265 km/h / 165 mph-14.4 s Calculated | 62.4s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph-11.0 s Calculated | 65.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph-8.3 s Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s-1.8 s | 6.1s-1.3 s | 6.6s-0.8 s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.0s-9.7 s Calculated | 19.9s-6.9 s Calculated | 22.7s-4.0 s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s-1.7 s Calculated | 5.9s-1.2 s Calculated | 6.3s-0.8 s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s-1.7 s Calculated | 14.1s-1.2 s Calculated | 14.6s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 394Nm/t263lb-ft/ton Calculated | 344Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,646km1,023mi Calculated | 1,646km1,023mi Calculated | 1,646km1,023mi Calculated | 1,646km1,023mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 136mm5in | 136mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L | 380L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 281 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 244 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 1) 217 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 181 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.0 s | 19.9 s | 22.7 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.0 s | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.1 s | 14.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 281 hp 209 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 244 hp 182 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 217 hp 162 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 181 hp 135 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 281 hp has 100 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 181 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 181 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 281 hp: 100 hp (74 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 5.6 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 6.1 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 6.6 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 281 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 181 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 244 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 1) 217 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 1,646 km 1,023 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 1,646 km 1,023 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 1,646 km 1,023 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 1,646 km 1,023 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 281 hp 209 kW | 5.6 s | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 244 hp 182 kW | 6.1 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 217 hp 162 kW | 6.6 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 181 hp 135 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 281 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 3)281 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 2)244 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 (Stage 1)217 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4181 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 281 hp 209 kW | 244 hp 182 kW | 217 hp 162 kW | 181 hp 135 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,646 km 1,023 mi | 1,646 km 1,023 mi | 1,646 km 1,023 mi | 1,646 km 1,023 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 281 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 244 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 1) 217 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 181 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.17 LC100 km | 7.17 LC100 km | 7.17 LC100 km | 7.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,076 LC/year | 1,076 LC/year | 1,076 LC/year | 1,076 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 281 hp
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 244 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























