Infiniti QX30
Car comparison
Infiniti QX30 2.0t · Stage 3vsInfiniti QX30 2.0t · Stage 2vsInfiniti QX30 2.0t · Stage 1vsInfiniti QX30 2.0t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti QX30
2.0t (Stage 2)
Infiniti QX30
2.0t (Stage 1)
Infiniti QX30
2.0t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 3) 317 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed262 km/h163 mph
- Most powerful317 hp236 kW
- Highest torque543 Nm400 lb-ft
- Lightest1,467 kg3,234 lb
- Best power-to-weight216 hp/t161 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range836 km519 mi
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 317hp236kW+106 hp | 274hp205kW+63 hp | 249hp186kW+38 hp | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm | 473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm | 427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,467kg3,234lb | 1,467kg3,234lb | 1,467kg3,234lb | 1,467kg3,234lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.3s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph-14.8 s Calculated | 76.4s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph-9.8 s Calculated | 79.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph-6.5 s Calculated | 86.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s-1.6 s | 6.2s-1.1 s | 6.6s-0.7 s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s-13.5 s Calculated | 23.2s-9.7 s Calculated | 26.3s-6.5 s Calculated | 32.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 5.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 6.2s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s-1.5 s Calculated | 14.3s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.6s-0.6 s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 370Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 322Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 836km519mi Calculated | 836km519mi Calculated | 836km519mi Calculated | 836km519mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,425mm174in | 4,425mm174in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,815mm71in | 1,815mm71in | 1,815mm71in | 1,815mm71in |
| Height | 1,530mm60in | 1,530mm60in | 1,530mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,700mm106in | 2,700mm106in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,572mm62in | 1,572mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,573mm62in | 1,573mm62in | 1,573mm62in | 1,573mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 232mm9in | 232mm9in | 232mm9in | 232mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 430L | 430L | 430L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 56L | 56L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | 155g/km | 155g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 3) 317 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 2) 274 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 1) 249 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti QX30 2.0t 211 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 23.2 s | 26.3 s | 32.9 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.4 s | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.0 s | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.3 s | 14.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 317 hp 236 kW |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 274 hp 205 kW |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 249 hp 186 kW |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 211 hp 157 kW |
Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 3) 317 hp has 106 hp more than Infiniti QX30 2.0t 211 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti QX30 2.0t 211 hp and Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 3) 317 hp: 106 hp (79 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 1,467 kg 3,234 lb |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 1,467 kg 3,234 lb |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 1,467 kg 3,234 lb |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 1,467 kg 3,234 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 5.7 s |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 6.2 s |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 6.6 s |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 3) 317 hp and Infiniti QX30 2.0t 211 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 2) 274 hp and Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 1) 249 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 836 km 519 mi |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 836 km 519 mi |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 836 km 519 mi |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 836 km 519 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 317 hp 236 kW | 5.7 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 274 hp 205 kW | 6.2 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 249 hp 186 kW | 6.6 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 3) 317 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 3)317 hp | InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 2)274 hp | InfinitiQX302.0t (Stage 1)249 hp | InfinitiQX302.0t211 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 317 hp 236 kW | 274 hp 205 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,467 kg 3,234 lb | 1,467 kg 3,234 lb | 1,467 kg 3,234 lb | 1,467 kg 3,234 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 836 km 519 mi | 836 km 519 mi | 836 km 519 mi | 836 km 519 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | 155 g/km | 155 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 3) 317 hp | Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 2) 274 hp | Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 1) 249 hp | Infiniti QX30 2.0t 211 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 3) 317 hp
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Infiniti QX30 2.0t (Stage 2) 274 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























